I tired the 0-60 thing.

"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes) 04/21/2017 at 13:45 • Filed to: None

0

12

Stock it dyno’s 173whp, with 15% that’s 199hp crank (Nissan rates it 188hp). That is quicker then is, but people have got a stock Juke to do low-mid 7 second 0-60.

Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 13:53

0

Add your own weight though.

This ain’t happening. Not without some mods.

That’s shockingly close to what I measured (6.9)

EL_ULY > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 13:54

3

I want to build a mean GT-R that does 0-60 in under 2 seconds...... then put a speed limiter at 65 :]

Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer > EL_ULY 04/21/2017 at 14:00

0

That’s the real-life equivalent of those gifs that never QUITE let the truck hit the wall.

Why must you be so cruel

Textured Soy Protein > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 14:24

0

Imma just drop this right here (yes this includes my weight) and wait for someone to post a better one with their car. There’s always somebody faster.

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > EL_ULY 04/21/2017 at 14:52

0

Whiplash

interstate366, now In The Industry > Textured Soy Protein 04/21/2017 at 14:53

0

Impressive. I got 6.404 off my rough estimates (220 HP, 2990 pounds with me in it, FWD, manual). About what I expected.

fhrblig > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 15:02

0

Sure, but have you tried that crazy wrap thing? IT WORKS!!!!!1!

Neil drives a beetle and a fancy beetle > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 15:09

0

This calculator is pretty nifty. It’s not perfect but it’s usually close. Some cars just fall outside of expectations, both a little slow and fast(including when different types of autos are used, or when a car needs a 2nd shift to hit 60). It also gives interesting insight into questions like, “oh an intake and tune is worth 8hp, what would that look like by the numbers?”

Flyboy is FAA certified insane > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 15:13

0

It’s a little off. The 733's factory quoted time was 9.0 with the 5-speed and 11.0 with the Auto

Dave the car guy , still here > Textured Soy Protein 04/21/2017 at 15:58

0

Not going to beat you but my numbers approx 270hp / 3860 weight/ AWD/ Dual clutch/ 5.554 sec 0-60 by the calculator

Otherwise 5.65 sec 0-60 with 14.1 qtr @ 99 mph using PocketDyno® app.

Looking at phenolic intake spacer and high flow cats to bump me closer to 290-295hp. Not looking for anything super fast but want over 100 mph and high 13s in qtr. I live about an hour from Norwalk and figure once I get it sorted I’ll confirm the calculator and iphone app/GPS numbers at the track.

I’m getting 25-27 mpg highway and 20-21 city on the 2008 VR6 after tune.

awmaster10 > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 15:58

0

Not bad for a 15 year old 4x4

Dusty Ventures > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 04/21/2017 at 18:59

0

This may actually be pessimistic. I datalogged a 0-60 run late last year, and did a 6.58 with 0.52 lost to a bogged start. Wonder if that means the ol’ wagon’s got a sub-6 run in it.